<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Aptly Named, Sam's Blog &#187; camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.samgrover.com/category/camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.samgrover.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 00:08:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>One year with a Voigtländer Bessa R2A rangefinder</title>
		<link>http://blog.samgrover.com/2008/01/19/one-year-with-a-voigtlander-bessa-r2a-rangefinder/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.samgrover.com/2008/01/19/one-year-with-a-voigtlander-bessa-r2a-rangefinder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samgrover</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.samgrover.com/2008/01/19/one-year-with-a-voigtlander-bessa-r2a-rangefinder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was heavier than I expected. I had ignored my cardinal law in purchasing a camera, &#8220;Hold it in your hands to see how it feels&#8221;. One year has gone by with me using <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/samgrover/357893935/">the Bessa</a> exclusively, and I love it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/samgrover/420818937/" title="Artist by samgrover, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/172/420818937_3eb85528cf_m.jpg" alt="Artist" height="145" width="240" /></a></p>
<p>I bought it along with a 50mm Nokton f/1.5 lens and an adapter. The camera has an M mount, whereas the lens is a screw mount, so I needed an adapter. My plan was that if I liked this enough I could get an M mount Leica lens in the future and it would fit just fine with the camera. I still plan on doing that. Perhaps a 35mm lens, but more on that later. I bought this Bessa at <a href="http://cameraquest.com/voigtr2ar3a.htm">CameraQuest</a>, a website that I haven&#8217;t visited since then. I never planned on buying more of this system and I never had any issues.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/samgrover/525781647/" title="Awaiting summer by samgrover, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1066/525781647_5b7580102c_m.jpg" alt="Awaiting summer" height="145" width="240" /></a></p>
<p>My <a href="http://samgrover.com/2006/05/early-experience-with-a-rangef.php">early experience with a rangefinder</a> camera was in 2006 when I borrowed a <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/samgrover/tags/canonetql17giii/show/" class="Plain">Canonet <span class="caps">QL17</span> G-<span class="caps">III</span></a> from my friend <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/old_sarge/">Doug</a>. At the end of that month I was hooked and understood why the rangefinder is the best camera for street photography. A sentiment expressed by many a famous street photographers of the last century. My favorite part about a rangefinder is that since I can see the frame lines, I can see the things that I&#8217;m not including in the frame. You can never do that with an <span class="caps">SLR</span>. That allows me to frame the shot best, especially on the street when I have only a fraction of a second to frame and shoot a photo. I don&#8217;t have to worry about focusing because I pre-focus and set a high depth-of-field. When I bring the camera to my eye, all I have to do is frame and click. And I love it when the camera goes &#8220;click&#8221;. The Bessa has a quick sharp sound that is barely noticeable as compared to the extended louder sound of the <span class="caps">DSLR</span>.</p>
<p>Another characteristic of the rangefinder is that you can see the photo at the moment of exposure, while in the <span class="caps">SLR</span> you just see nothing. As a result, at the beginning, my timing was  a bit off with this camera, but not only did I get used to it, I started to love it. Most of the time I take a photo, I just click one frame. No second chance. So it helps to know if I got what I was going for, even though the suspense remains until I actually get the film processed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/samgrover/1429955514/" title="Swinging by samgrover, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1015/1429955514_2555d1be68_m.jpg" alt="Swinging" height="240" width="154" /></a></p>
<p>Over the last year I&#8217;ve put up 193 photos taken with this camera on <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/samgrover/">my Flickr photostream</a>, about 76% of all my uploaded photos for 2007. That&#8217;s not an immense number and probably would&#8217;ve been even smaller had I not made the trips to <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/samgrover/sets/72157602125513976/show/">Burning Man</a> and to <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/samgrover/sets/72157603288998293/show/">India</a>. I put up 481 photos in 2006 and 807 photos in 2005. I think the trend is down because the cost of using film has made me frugal.</p>
<p>I like using film because of the texture that it imparts to a photograph. I haven&#8217;t experimented a whole lot with different films, and settled quite early with Tri-X. Most of the time I push it to <span class="caps">ISO</span> 1600 and gives me just the right kind of contrast I like. It also helps to push the film in Portland, since most days are overcast and higher <span class="caps">ISO</span> films cost more <img src='http://blog.samgrover.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Having said that, more and more manufacturers of are moving out of the 35mm film market. That trend has me thinking of digital rangefinders for the future. We&#8217;ll see how that goes.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ve spent enough time with the 50mm lens to now explore more primes. I would prefer to go wider, as that&#8217;s what I find lacking sometimes when I frame a shot. Also, I think it would help me get closer while out on the street. So, sometime this year, I&#8217;ll get a 35mm M mount lens, hopefully a Leica one. After all, that was the plan <img src='http://blog.samgrover.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.samgrover.com/2008/01/19/one-year-with-a-voigtlander-bessa-r2a-rangefinder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early experience with a rangefinder camera</title>
		<link>http://blog.samgrover.com/2006/05/27/early-experience-with-a-rangefinder-camera/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.samgrover.com/2006/05/27/early-experience-with-a-rangefinder-camera/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 03:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samgrover</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.samgrover.com/2006/05/27/early-experience-with-a-rangefinder-camera/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/samgrover/153954606/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/61/153954606_bfdd8d8605_m.jpg" alt="Chess or Mac?" align="right" height="160" width="240" /></a>I borrowed a rangefinder camera from a <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/old_sarge/" title="Photos from Old Sarge">friend</a> a couple of weeks ago. The camera is a <a href="http://www.cameraquest.com/canql17.htm" title="Canonet QL17 G-III">Canonet <span class="caps">QL17</span> G-<span class="caps">III</span></a>. I&#39;ve gone through one roll on it and it&#39;s been fun to use so far. I had been using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-lens_reflex_camera" title="Single Lens Reflex camera"><span class="caps">SLR</span></a> cameras until now and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rangefinder_camera" title="Rangefinder camera">rangefinder</a> is quite different in operation. The major difference being that the image viewed through the viewfinder is not the same as the one that is seen by the lens. In an <span class="caps">SLR</span> you see through the lens, so it&#39;s more of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WYSIWYG" title="What You See Is What You Get"><span class="caps">WYSIWYG</span></a> interface. Here are some of my impressions with using this camera.</p>
<ul>
<li>It&#39;s a little bizzare to see the lens through the viewfinder, but I got over that pretty soon.</li>
<li>It is well known that rangefinders are quiet because they don&#39;t have a moving mirror. Even so, I was surprised by the quietness of the mechanism.</li>
<li>The shutter priority operation threw me off for a while because I&#39;m used to shooting with aperture priority. It makes me think in terms of time, while I&#39;m used to thinking in terms of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depth_of_field" title="Depth of field">depth of field</a>, or rather not thinking much in terms of either by setting the parameters once and not messing with it unless really needed.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/samgrover/151705515/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/50/151705515_58bd3e843d_m.jpg" alt="In the tree&#39;s shadow" align="left" height="160" width="240" /></a>The hardest thing to do was the focusing. The viewfinder has a very small area to check the focus accurately, and its not something I could manage to do quickly. I found myself pre-focusing most of the time by reading the distance marking on the lens. So, I used the viewfinder only for framing, just before taking the picture. I like the speed of such operation, but have been reluctant to do pre-focusing before now. This camera kinda forced it upon me and I&#39;ll try to do it more often. I think it is a good skill to have for street photography, especially when using a manual focus mechanism. There is usually no time to focus.</p>
<p>It&#39;s been <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/samgrover/77921985/" title="Of course it&#39;s raining, d&#39;uh!">raining again</a> for the last week, so I haven&#39;t had any chance to shoot more with this camera. Hopefully things will clear up next week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.samgrover.com/2006/05/27/early-experience-with-a-rangefinder-camera/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
